Where Hateful Acts Are an Everyday Reality

Author: Mary Grace Donaldson, Current Events/Politics

In the wake of the white supremacist events in Charlottesville, it’s easy to be disheartened. To lose hope. To wonder how these types of acts continue, how we’ve allowed them to continue, and how their perpetuators think any of it is acceptable. While it’s apparent that the mentality has existed in Charlottesville even before these rallies, many of us are hearing about all of it for the first time, or may not have even known this was still happening in our country.

Sure, we’ve known about the existence of white supremacy, even in 2017, when we’ve “made progress.” We’ve seen and become outraged over hate crimes. We’ve fought for acceptance for all races and supported and realized the importance of Black Lives Matter. But after Charlottesville, this is right in front of our faces. And while we should never have let it get this far, we didn’t take what led up to it seriously enough. As a result of the belief that we didn’t think it was “this bad,” we are nothing short of shocked.

The good news for America? We still live in a country where there is shock and anger and heartbreak over events like Charlottesville because we have certain freedoms, and we have enough of a collective conscience (minus, of course, the members of groups like the KKK and the National Policy Institute) to know that this type of racist, bigoted thinking is wrong. As a result of our freedoms, we’re allowed to the belief that it’s wrong, and we can raise our voices without fearing for our lives or the loss of the freedoms we’ve always known.

In certain other countries, acts similar to what happened in Charlottesville, and worse, occur ever single day at the hands of the government. They occur in the name of bigotry and hatred. In some cases, civilians commit these acts and the government either responds with denial, or doesn’t respond at all. What’s worse, in some cases, they are the law of the land. And as they’re occurring, civilians aren’t allowed the right of peaceful protest — as they fear for their lives as well as the potential loss of whatever freedoms they do have.

 

North Korea
The nuclear threat out of North Korea has been in the news for weeks, as well as its general threats toward the United States. But what we don’t always hear about is life in North Korea for civilians. Women and children are being executed at the hands of the government for what is considered a crime — including watching a movie out of Hollywood. In other words, something that isn’t propaganda in favor of the government. Something that doesn’t promote hate and violence. This viral video gives even more of a glimpse:

South Africa
According to Human Rights Watch’s 2017 World Report, the government of South Africa has been based in bigotry, hatred, and corruption for years. It has not “developed a national strategy to combat the high rate of violence against women and the continued underreporting of rape.” It has “failed to hold accountable those responsible for xenophobic attacks on the businesses and homes of refugees, asylum-seekers, and migrants between March and May, 2015.” And it did not condemn or properly address Zulu King Goodwill Zwelithini’s 2015 remarks that foreigners should “pack their bags and go home.”

Latin American countries
These countries — not limited to one or two — have a long and unfortunate history of violence. According to an openDemocracy report, seven out of ten countries with the world’s largest murder rate for women are located in Latin America, based on 2015 statistics. While these murders — based in a sexist line of thinking — are often found to be based in the home and not based out of the government, many of the countries are based in “male-dominated power structures.” In other words, the governments may not be perpetuating the acts, but their actions promote the notion that they are acceptable. Additionally, such power structures allow for women to be forced into organized crime in order to protect themselves, and the government hasn’t done a whole lot to stop that.

India
While not all of the hate perpetuated in India is at the hands of the government, women live in a state of constant fear. And while the government may not be the source of the hate, officials haven’t done much, if anything at all, to stop the country’s general attitude toward women. As if that’s not enough, the hate crimes that take place aren’t just specific to women, but also to other races. Human Rights Watch cites an incident in which a student from Nigeria visited India and received a public beating. While the government condemned the act, it did not acknowledge it as a race-related hate crime.

Poland
Again, another government that did not commit the acts, but, in a somewhat worse display of judgment, let neo-Nazi acts perpetuate. VICE News reported in May 2017 that Poland’s populist government has allowed “far-right extremism explode into the mainstream.” While that echos of Charlottesville, the situation appears to be even more out in the open. Not to mention, “Openly xenophobic far-right politicians have seats in Parliament, and the populist government of the conservative Law and Justice party has adopted a nationalist, anti-immigrant platform that shares much ground with the far right.”

 

While Charlottesville may have opened our eyes to the fact that white supremacy and other hateful acts are unfortunately alive and well, it’s important to recognize that in no country should they be permitted to just be a fact of life where not one person, not even government officials, bats an eye. Millennials, let’s not forget that this is happening both in our own metaphorical backyard, as well as across the world.

 

Disclaimer: The political views presented in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Not Another Millennial Blog.

“On Thin Ice”: Has Thin-Skinned Trump Met His Match in Kim Jong Un?

Author: Alli Jean, Current Events/Politics

From the schoolyard to the highest office in the land, it has long been advised that bullies and those that oppress others can be halted when you cut off their resources, isolate them and limit their influence.

Perhaps this is why the mounting tensions with North Korea are so foreboding; this is a nation that has prided itself on its isolation. Its leader, Kim Jung Un, has few allies and has no interest in compromise, specifically concerning its growing nuclear program. Many politicians are urging that China, North Korea’s closest ally, should handle the negotiations.

Despite the activity in recent weeks by North Korea of testing of nuclear weapons, the threat of this nation’s nuclear weapons arsenal is anything but new, but that hasn’t stopped the current administration from declaring that “the era of strategic patience is over.” Not similarly to North Korea, the Trump administration has expressed that he would rather act alone than cooperate with others if he does not agree

Now, what does this mean for us?
President Trump, over what is apparently the most amazing chocolate cake in the world, told China’s President Xi Jinping in no uncertain terms, that they must deal with the situation in North Korea, or the United States will intervene. Vice President Pence echoed these sentiments when he traveled to South Korea over the holiday weekend. However, many warn that mishandling of this situation will cause Kim Jong Un to bomb South Korea, our ally, in retaliation.

Many have noted that unlike ISIS and other enemies the United States has faced, air strikes and sending in troops is not an option. Based on its leadership and past history, North Korea is an enemy that requires effective cooperation with South Korea, China, Russia, etc., in order to halt the expansion of their nuclear operations, and the inevitable worldwide destruction if their arsenal is expanded.

Does President Trump have the foreign policy experience to encourage effective cooperation with these countries before the eventuality of the United States’ intervention? Or should we be more focused on the realities here at home and not intervene at all?

In facing Kim Jong Un, a paranoid and isolationist dictator, has President Trump met his match? Is he capable of cooperating with allies, or in a late-night Twitter rant, will President Trump bring us into even greater conflict that has been thus-far avoided by diplomacy and careful negotiations?

Surely, this could be a turning point for President Trump as a leader; let’s hope his ego won’t get in the way of diplomacy.

 

Disclaimer: The political views presented in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Not Another Millennial Blog.